Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Chronology Part II the 70 weeks in Daniel

"Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks:the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself:and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate" Daniel 9:25-27

This passage is also mentioned by Jesus in Mark 13:14 "But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee..." thus marking this as a key passage in our understanding of the end times. We are not concerned with the final week here, its time is to be yet fulfilled, but with the first 7 and 62 weeks which have historically happened.

The beginning of this time is the command to restore and to build Jerusalem, fulfilled in Cyrus' command after he became ruler of Babylon. This year we showed in part I is 539BC.
"Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing, saying, Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, The Lord God of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he hath charged me to build him an house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah" Ezra 1:1-2

What follows has been confused in many ways, trying to fit each piece of Persian/Median history, statements from Daniel, Ezra and Nehemiah as well as the prophets Haggai and Zechariah, together has left some wondering how these disparate witnesses can be reconciled. Some confusion occurs because of the kingly names being reused, particularly Darius and Artaxerxes.

We will begin with the kings of the Achaemenid line in Persia: These dates are generally accepted throughout the academic community, and unlike many Egyptian dates are felt to be certain.

Cyrus 559-530 BC; Contemporary with Darius the Mede, Dan 5:30; Dan 9; Dan 10:1at this time
Cambyses 530-522 BC
Darius I 522-486 BC
Xerxes 486-465 BC (Ahasuerus)
Artaxerxes 465-424 BC
Darius II 424-405 BC
Artaxerxes II 404-358 BC
Artaxerxes III 358-338 BC
Arses 338-336 BC
Darius codomannus 336-332 BC (defeated by Alexander the Great)

When we read in Ezra about the trouble caused by the people of the land we see the same order of the first five kings,
"Then the people of the land weakened the hands of the people of Judah, and troubled them in building, And hired counsellors against them, to frustrate their purpose, all the days of Cyrus king of Persia, even until the reign of Darius king of Persia. And in the reign of Ahasuerus, in the beginning of his reign, wrote they unto him an accusation against the inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem.
 And in the days of Artaxerxes wrote..." Ezra 4:4-7
We know that the name Ahasuerus is often associated with the name Xerxes, and if Cambyses is covered in the term from Cyrus to Darius than all of the first five kings are covered in this section. At the end of chapter 4, Artaxerxes writes back to cease the restoration and verse 24 tells us this ceased unto the second year of Darius, obviously speaking of Darius II. His second year would be 422 BC, 117 years from the 539 BC command from Cyrus to rebuild.
In Ezra 5:1 we hear the call begin, "Then the prophets, Haggai the prophet, and Zechariah the son of Iddo, prophesied..." It is at this time that we enter the time of these prophets, Nehemiah and Joshua son of Jozedek.

So looking back at the prophecy of Daniel we see 7 weeks, 62 weeks, troublous times, and a final week determined upon Israel. If we split this up we get a 49 year period, a 434 year period and what would seem to be a third period which I believe is clearly in-between the first two.

The first 7 weeks, or 49 years is from 539 BC to 490 BC. This extends from the command to restore Jerusalem by Cyrus into most of the reign of Darius I, matching with the Cyrus to Darius in Ezra 4 noted above.
Next we want to determine when the 62 weeks, or 434 years, begins. We have an advantage in that we know when it ends; when Messiah is cut off. We know that Jesus was crucified in 30 AD. 434 years before this is 404 BC, exactly at the beginning of the reign of Artaxerxes II.

If this is correct, than the interregnum covers from c490 to c404 BC, or 86 years, covering the reigns of Xerxes (Ahasuerus), Artaxerxes I and Darius II. These are the exact kings mentioned in Ezra as being involved in the letter writings back and forth when the enemies of Israel are determined to make the Jews stop their rebuilding projects. During the reign of Darius II, the Jews, with the help of Nehemiah and Haggai and Zechariah begin again to rebuild and eventually a search is made by Darius II to find the original decree of Cyrus. (Ezra 5:17-6:13)
Nehemiah 2:1 states that He left for Jerusalem in the 20th year of Artaxerxes, one we would take to be Artaxerxes I and therefore the year 445 BC. He continued for 12 years unto 433 BC Neh 5:14; 13:6) It is during this time that he begins to sanctify Israel to seek the Lord.
Haggai 1:1; Zech 1:1; are in the second year of Darius...; being Darius II, and nearing the end of the troublous times. Zech 7:1 is in the fourth year of Darius.

It is interesting to note that Zechariah mentions another period of 70 years in Zech 7:5, this is the 4th year of Darius being 420 BC, or 70 years after the date of 490 BC we get for the end of the first 7 weeks (49 years). He is speaking near the end of the interregnum, encouraging the people to seek the Lord and get on with the job (Also see Zech 1:12), but the beginning of this period is when the first work ceased. It is quite instructive to see that the people were near the end, they had come at the command of Cyrus, been encouraged by Nehemiah in the midst of the troublous times to rebuild the wall, had gotten Darius to find the decree of Cyrus and now years later were nearing the end of rebuilding the temple. This was not a light thing because it solidified the place of Israel as a nation again. Here we read the prophecies of Zechariah 7-14 and Malachi in the context of coming into the fulness of what God had planned for them and the ultimate judgment of God on them and all the nations round about. Malachi particularly echoes Zech 7:5. The people are losing heart, growing weary, but the prophets come to correct and to instruct that they might not weary even though it had been generations since the command to rebuild.

Finally the job is finished and the worship of God re-instituted:
"And the elders of the Jews builded, and they prospered through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they builded, and finished it, according to the commandment of the God of Israel, and according to the commandment of Cyrus, and Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia. And this house was finished on the third day of the month Adar, which was in the sixth year of the reign of Darius the king" Ezra 6:14-15
This is 418 BC, the sixth year of Darius II.

"Now after these things, in the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia, Ezra..." Ezra 7:1 This would be Artaxerxes II. Here we have the beginning of the period of 62 weeks unto the Messiah. The wall is rebuilt, the temple in operation and the Jews dwelling again in their homeland.

What have we learned? The Bible speaks of many kings of the Persian empire and gets everyone in proper order and helps us to understand what is happening around the command of God. Not a single statement fails to fit exactly into this construct.

Below is a graphic representation of the timeline which incorporates all these things:
Daniel’s 70 weeks
Judah
Egypt
Babylon
Media
Persia
70 weeks of Daniel
Notes
High Priest
Greece
? AD





Final Week



??????
1948 return





Church Age


30 AD






Messiah (Jesus) crucified


4 BC





404 BC-30 AD



100 BC









200 BC









300 BC

Ptolemy
Seleucus





Cassander
310 BC









332 BC




Darius III (Artashatta/Codomannus) 336-332 BC

Battle of Guagamela 331 BC

Alexander conquers Persia 332
340 BC




Artaxerxes IV (Arses) 338-336 BC




350 BC

reconquers Egypt 343 BC


Artaxerxes III (Ochus) 358 BC-338 BC




360 BC




Artaxerxes II




370 BC
32nd year Neh 5:14; 13:6



Artaxerxes II




380 BC
20th yr of Artaxerxes Neh 2:1



Artaxerxes II
Walls rebuilt in troublous times

The Levites in the days of Eliashib- to the reign of Darius the Persian

390 BC




Artaxerxes II


And Jeshua begat Joiakim, Joiakim also begat Eliashib, and Eliashib begat Joiada (Neh 12:10)

400 BC

Amyertaus
Battle of Cunaxa 401 BC

Artaxerxes II 404BC-358 BC
62 weeks or 434 years
Ezra 7:1; during the reign of Artaxerxes comes Ezra the priest 7th year of Artaxerxes
Joiakim son of Joshua
The 10,000 and Xenophon (Anabasis)
405 BC




Darius II




410 BC




Darius II




415 BC




Darius II

Finished Temple (House of God) in 6th year of Darius; Ezra 6:15


420 BC
Zech 1:1,7 2nd yr of Darius (Ezra 5:1); Haggai 1:1; 2:10

Zech 1:12 is KEY
Edict of Cyrus rediscovered in Ecbatana of the Medes
Darius II 424 BC-405 BC
Ezra 6:15 6th year of Darius finished house
Wall still broken down
Neh 8 Ezra & Nehemiah
(Zech 1:12 2nd year of Darius (Lo these 70 years; 490-420) Zech 7 4th year)  Zech 7:5, Edict of Cyrus rediscovered; Ezra 5; Ezra 6&7 work continues

Ezra 3:2 build the altar

425 BC
Zerubabel



Artaxerxes


Joshua son of Jozadek

430 BC




Artaxerxes

Alternate Esther? (Josephus)


435 BC




Artaxerxes




440 BC




Artaxerxes




445 BC




Artaxerxes




450 BC




Artaxerxes
? 86 yr interregnum
KEY Ezra 4:24 work ceased unto 2nd year of Darius
Ezra 7:1 7th year of Artaxerxes

455 BC




Artaxerxes (Longimannus)

Ezra 4:7


460 BC

Inaros Revolts in Egypt


Artaxerxes 465 BC-424 BC




465 BC




Xerxes




470 BC




Xerxes

Esther; Ahasuerus over 127 provinces


475 BC




Xerxes




480 BC




Xerxes



Battles of Thermopylae, Salamis and Platea
485 BC




Xerxes 486 BC-465 BC

Ezra 4:6 Xerxes = Ahasueras

Daniel 11:2; stirs up Greece
490 BC




Darius I 



Battle of Marathon vs Greece
495 BC




Darius I 




500 BC




Darius I 




505 BC




Darius I 




510 BC




Darius I 

founds Persepolis (Paarsa)


515 BC




Darius I 

Darius conquers in civil war


520 BC




Darius I 522 BC-486 BC

Darius the usurper, called king of kings


525 BC




Cambyses




530 BC




Cambyses 530 BC-522 BC
7 weeks or 49 years, 539-490 BC
Opposition all the days of Cyrus until Darius and into the days of Ahasueras Ezra 4


535 BC
Sheshbazzar, the prince of Judah
Daniel 9; 1st year Darius the Mede

Darius the Mede rules Babylon short time to 538
Cyrus
Daniel 9:25-27
Ezra 1:1 Cyrus’ command freeing Jews to return


539 BC
Ezra 1:1

Belteshazzar regent/Babylon
Darius the Mede
Cyrus (First year as king of Babylon)
609 BC-539 BC
Cyrus conq Babylon 539 BC


540 BC









545 BC


Nabonidus

Cyrus




550 BC


Nabonidus

Cyrus 550 BC-530 BC

Cyrus deposes Astyages 550 BC


555 BC


Nabonidus 555-539 BC (after 2 others)
Astyages
Achaemenids

Cyrus marries Astyages daughter


560 BC


Others
Astyages





565 BC


Nebuchadnezzer 605-562 BC
Astyages





570 BC
Zedekiah 597-586 BC

Nebuchadnezzer
Astyages

70 years of Jeremiah 25 and 29
Israel served Babylon until released by Cyrus



575 BC


Nebuchadnezzer
Astyages





580 BC


Nebuchadnezzer
Astyages





585 BC


Nebuchadnezzer
Astyages 585-549 BC Median





590 BC


Nebuchadnezzer
Cyaxares





595 BC
Jehoiachin

Nebuchadnezzer
Cyaxares





600 BC
Jehoiakim

Nebuchadnezzer
Cyaxares


Second captivity 2 Kings 24:1-10 598/7 BC 2Chr 36 Jer 52 Esther 2:1


605 BC
Jehoahaz
Battle of Carchemish 605 BC
Nebuchadnezzer 605-562 BC
Cyaxares


First captivity 605 BC (Dan 1:1)
Mordecai’ ancestor (Esther 2:6) captivity 597 with Jehoiachin



610 BC
Josiah

Nabopolasser 626 BC-605 BC
Cyaxares

609 BC-539 BC
2 Kings 23:26-27 after Josiah Jehovah turns Judah over. Pharaoh Necho deposes Jehoahaz 


625 BC
Josiah 640-609 BC
Pharaoh Necho
Nabopolasser 626 BC-605 BC
Cyaxares 624-585 BC Median

Isa 44:27-45:1 Isaiah prophecies of Cyrus





There is a problematic individual; Darius the Mede. He is mentioned as king of Babylon by Daniel when it is first conquered by the Medo-Persian empire, and he is the one who famously had Daniel thrown into a den of lions. I believe that he is the Median General who first took Babylon for Cyrus, and he only reigned for 1 year in Babylon before he died; this fits perfectly with the book of Daniel which mentions no further years of Kingship for him. The General is known as Agabu and is known to have lived only a short time after the conquering of Babylon, fitting with the only mention of him in Daniel. The following is a very good monograph on the subject which I recommend reading if you are interested in Darius the Mede. http://www.auss.info/auss_publication_file.php?pub_id=654
Some have said that Darius the Mede was Astyages the Father-in-law of Cyrus, I have not seen clear evidence for this in the contradictory accounts which exist, but either way, he was not Cyrus himself, but a king under the Great King, and as the Bible makes clear, a short-lived ruler of Babylon.

The next difficult persons are Mordecai, Esther and the Ahasuerus who marries Esther. (Ahasuerus is believed to be a title by some, but as a name it is linked to Xerxes, beginning his reign in 486 BC). According to the book of Esther, 2:5, Mordecai's Grandfather Kish went into captivity with Jeconiah (Jehoiachin). This is important, for the common idea that Mordecai went captive with Jehoiachin is untenable chronologically as he would be about 125 years old at this time. Mordecai appears in Shushan, a different city from Babylon, a city of the Medes and palace of Xerxes, remember that the Medes were allies of Babylon and must have shared in the captives taken from Jerusalem. In addition we know that Ahasuerus ruled from India to Ethiopia over 127 provinces (Esther 1:1), an extent which did not happen until after Cyrus and a division which has not yet been identified. Therefore I conclude Esther is a wife of Xerxes. (Alternatively she could be a wife of his son Artaxerxes I)

"Now in Shushan the palace there was a certain Jew, whose name was Mordecai, the son of Jair, the son of Shimei, the son of Kish, a Benjamite; Who had been carried away from Jerusalem with the captivity which had been carried away with Jeconiah king of Judah, whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried away" Esther 2:5-6

Lastly is Joiakim son of Joshua son of Josedech. Joshua is a key player throughout the interregnum period and his son Joiakim takes over from him according to Nehemiah 12:26. Joshua seems to be High Priest during much of this troublous times, and is mentioned in what appears to be early returnees with Zerubabel and appears up to 70 years later in Zechariah but passes the priesthood to his son Joiakim at what was likely a very old age.

So much more to say, the story is great, Covering over 200 years of time and more than anything else teaching us to trust in God. To hear the prophecies of Haggai and Zechariah in the context of exactly what was occurring and the tremendous opposition that they faced speaks to faithfulness and determination to seek the kingdom of God (Here represented in the temple in Jerusalem) above your own life. They were fought against, in peril, and yet persevered to trust God to see it through.

Chronology Part I the 70 years prophesied by Jeremiah

I have finished my research on the problem of the chronology of the 70 years of Jeremiah and the 70 weeks of years of Daniel and how they fit with accepted Babylonian and Persian Chronology.
What I want to do here is to explain why it is important and how the Bible is specific and correct in every point. Many would say, "well I already knew that!" What is at issue is that many in the academic community continue to challenge the Bible because the pieces do not fit preconceived ideas. It also causes some relatively offbeat ideas to gain traction as people try to explain the seemingly unexplainable.

In Jeremiah we find two places where he announces specific judgment upon the kingdom of Babylon which will in the future (from his perspective) destroy Judah.
"And it shall come to pass, when seventy years are accomplished, that I will punish the king of Babylon, and that nation, saith the Lord, for their iniquity, and the land of the Chaldeans, and will make it perpetual desolations." Jer 25:12
"For thus saith the Lord, That after seventy years be accomplished at Babylon I will visit you, and perform my good word toward you, in causing you to return to this place." Jer 29:10

When do these 70 years start, and when do they end? Clearly the end is when Babylon is itself conquered. This is done by the Medes and the Persians under Cyrus the Great. He declares that he has been charged to rebuild the temple in Jerusalem:

"Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing, saying, Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, The Lord God of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he hath charged me to build him an house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah." Ezra 1:1-2

According to history the Medes and the Persians conquered Babylon, allowing the freedom of the Jews, this occurred in 539 BC. So 70 years before this would be 609 BC. What is happening in 609 BC which would fit this narrative? 609 BC is the year that Josiah dies, the last king who is called good. In fact, there is a clear reference to the judgment to come on Judah at the end of his reign.

"And like unto him (Josiah) was there no king before him, that turned to the Lord with all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his might, according to all the law of Moses; neither after him arose there any like him.
 Notwithstanding the Lord turned not from the fierceness of his great wrath, wherewith his anger was kindled against Judah, because of all the provocations that Manasseh had provoked him withal. And the Lord said, I will remove Judah also out of my sight, as I have removed Israel, and will cast off this city Jerusalem which I have chosen, and the house of which I said, My name shall be there." 2Kings 23:25-27

Immediately after this Pharaoh Necho and Nebuchadnezzar II begin to interfere in the affairs of Judah, and they are no longer free. This can clearly be the time when the 70 years begin. There is a war between Egypt and Babylon, actually very extensive and involving many other players during this time. The chronicles of the kings of Babylon detail the campaigns of Nabopolasser and the early years of his son Nebuchadnezzar II. They are fighting against Assyria with their allies the Medes and Egypt is helping Assyria. After Josiah dies fighting against Egypt (2Ki 23) Pharaoh Necho sets up the king of his choice, This is 609 BC.

After this follows 4 kings:
*Jehoahaz (son of Josiah) for 3 mos
"And Pharaohnechoh put him in bands at Riblah in the land of Hamath, that he might not reign in Jerusalem; and put the land to a tribute of an hundred talents of silver, and a talent of gold" 2Ki 23:33
Egypt replaces him with:
*Jehoiakim (son of Josiah also called Eliakim) 609-598 BC
"In his days Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came up, and Jehoiakim became his servant three years:then he turned and rebelled against him" 2Ki 24:1
"In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon unto Jerusalem, and besieged it." Dan1:1 (Daniel and others taken captive)
"And the king of Egypt came not again any more out of his land:for the king of Babylon had taken from the river of Egypt unto the river Euphrates all that pertained to the king of Egypt" 2Ki 24:7
*Jehoiachin (son of Jehoiakim); 598-597 BC
"At that time the servants of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came up against Jerusalem, and the city was besieged" 2Ki 24:10 (second captivity Jehoiachin was 18 years old)
*Zedekiah (son of Josiah; also called Mattaniah) 597-586 BC
"...Zedekiah rebelled against the king of Babylon" 2Ki 24:20
"And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he, and all his host, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it; and they built forts against it round about. And the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah. And on the ninth day of the fourth month the famine prevailed in the city, and there was no bread for the people of the land" 2KI 25:1-3

The kings of Judah are shown in the Biblical narrative to be changing allegiances throughout this period.  It fits very well with the changing political situation of the ascendancy of Egypt and Babylon. The first captivity (Dan 1:1) to Babylon is in 605 BC (The one which included Daniel and his three friends and also included Kish the grandfather of Mordecai). The kings of Judah look to
Pharaoh to shield them from Babylon, but their trust is misplaced. In 586 BC is the final end of the kingdom of Judah with the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple by Nebuchadnezzer II in his 19th year. The people of Judah are taken into captivity for the reasons declared;

"And them that had escaped from the sword carried he away to Babylon; where they were servants to him and his sons until the reign of the kingdom of Persia: To fulfil the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah, until the land had enjoyed her sabbaths:for as long as she lay desolate she kept sabbath, to fulfil threescore and ten years" 2Chr 36:20-21

There is also mention of King Evil-Merodach of Babylon speaking kindly and removing from prison Jehoiachin;
"And it came to pass in the seven and thirtieth year of the captivity of Jehoiachin king of Judah, in the twelfth month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, that Evilmerodach king of Babylon in the year that he began to reign did lift up the head of Jehoiachin king of Judah out of prison;" 2Ki 25:27
Evil-Merodach is the same as Amel Marduk who reigned from 560-561 BC. He was the first king after Nebuchadnezzar. Since Jehoiachin went into captivity in 597 BC, than 37 years later is 560 BC, exactly where Amel Marduk is placed.

This is the time of Daniel, who lives in Babylon and serves the kings of that city and subsequently the  King known as Darius the Mede about whom we will learn more in part 2. The line of Babylonian rulers has ended and Daniel learns by the book of Jeremiah that the time of the captivity is to come to an end. "In the first year of Darius the son of Ahasuerus, of the seed of the Medes, which was made king over the realm of the Chaldeans; In the first year of his reign I Daniel understood by books the number of the years, whereof the word of the Lord came to Jeremiah the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy years in the desolations of Jerusalem." (Dan 9:2)

Thus the 70 years prophesied by Jeremiah are fulfilled and the land has her sabbaths, waiting for the promised release of the captive children. There is much more to say about the timeline of detailed issues during the time from 609 BC until 586 BC. Judah is never truly free to determine its own course because they do not trust in God; and there are detailed records of the campaigns of Babylon against Egypt and Assyria which the Bible only hints at. Much of the story is also found in the book of Jeremiah and the end of 2 Chronicles.

"And the Lord God of their fathers sent to them by his messengers, rising up betimes, and sending; because he had compassion on his people, and on his dwelling place: But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words, and misused his prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose against his people, till there was no remedy" 2Chr 36:15-16

Part II will discuss the historical setting of the 70 weeks which Daniel prophesied of. The times after the captivity of Israel and the coming of the Messiah.

Monday, May 30, 2016

Egyptian History; Displaced Dynasties

The following is a beginning I wrote for a proposed wikipedia page about a chronology of the ancient near east. It starts with a revision of Egyptian History, a need that has been clear for many years. The current Egyptian chronology was built upon many faulty assumptions based upon limited knowledge. The failures of this chronology are numerous, documented by many revisionists over the years, yet no one has been able to put all the pieces together. I spent many years reading various proposed revisions, but in 1998 I read the first parts of a new revision, covering ground everyone else seemed to consider settled, that work became the book Nebuchadnezzar and the Egyptian Exile, found here: http://www.displaceddynasties.com But let me tell you my story first.
My first chronology question began when, while studying the Bible and commentaries, I read that Ramesses II was the Pharaoh of the Exodus. A claim so absurd that it puts the Bible in doubt. The Pharaoh of the Bible drowned in the Red Sea after his first born was killed by the death angel. Ramesses lived into his 90's, has a tomb and his mummy has been found. How could this be? It stemmed from a faulty Egyptian chronology, only I did not have the expertise to see how to change it, only to see that something was wrong when I compared the Bible to books on ancient Egypt. My second entry into Egyptian History came with the documentary, Pharaohs and Kings, a biblical quest, by David Rohl. He opened a whole new world of showing the problems of Egyptian Chronology. He has gone on to write many books and has created a New Chronology based upon his findings. Lastly I read Centuries of Darkness by Peter James et al. A phenomenal book which details how faulty Egyptian Chronology has distorted the history of many other areas, particularly creating Greek Dark ages which are not existent from the Greek data. (This is by no means exhaustive, there are many other works which point out problems as well.)
All of these reference what appears to be the first major revisionist, Immanuel Velikovsky, someone whose works I have never read, and all suffer from the problems he did, a resistant academia who refuse to move off of their accepted chronology. All claim that the revisions are no better, and in some ways worse than the accepted chronology and therefore should just go away. Currently, unlike the early days of the 1880's, there has been a lot of work done in archaeology and chronological studies by many diligent people, but they are handicapped by the accepted Egyptian chronology causing very strained interpretations of their findings.
This brings us back to the focus of this post; a chronology which begins with a change no one else I have seen proposes, moving the 26th dynasty of Egypt parallel to the 27th dynasty, or Persian dynasty, and pulling everything else forward in time. This revision is the best I have seen to date and stands upon the work of all the previous people who have documented so many problems with the current academic chronology.
What is needed now is people from all the different historical disciplines to read this chronology and apply their expertise to test it, to compare it to the huge volume of good work out there on various archaeological sites and documents which have been translated, to find out if it continues to stand.
I am requesting a wider reading of this chronology and a recognition that a new understanding of the ancient near east is needed if we are to truly understand the past. What follows is an attempt at an introduction to this chronology:
Displaced Dynasties Chronology
This alternative chronology of Ancient Near Eastern History was begun by Jim Reilly in 1997 and continues through the present day. The chronology continues through four books on Egyptian History and 10+ papers on related cultures and their specific chronologies as they relate to this revision.
The first book in the series, Nebuchadnezzar & the Egyptian Exile, is described by Jim Reilly as follows:
The first volume in the Displaced Dynasties series was motivated by a single consideration. Almost seven chapters in the Hebrew Bible, exclusively contained in the writings of the biblical prophets Ezekiel and Jeremiah, describe an invasion of Egypt by Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, dated with some precision around the year 565 B.C. According to these two eyewitnesses the devastation inflicted on Egypt was catastrophic. Every temple in the country (with one exception) was demolished. Most of the population of Egypt was slaughtered or taken captive. Only a small remnant survived. For years Egypt was left without a resident pharaoh. Temple worship ceased. The devastation lasted for forty years, though from extra biblical sources we can determine that sporadic restoration activity was underway during the final two decades, following the 543 B.C. takeover of the country by Cyrus the Great. This rebuilding intensified under Cambyses, following his 525 B.C. expedition to Egypt, and into the reign of Darius I.
There is but a single problem with this history. According to Egyptologists it never happened. The denial is based on an Egyptian timeline which places Manetho’s 26th (Saite) dynasty in the time frame 664-525 B.C., leaving no room either for a twenty year interregnum or for an 18 year rule by the Persians prior to 525 B.C. Amasis (570-526 B.C.), the penultimate Saite dynasty king, ruled throughout the critical forty year period.
But the historians are wrong. The fault lies in the Egyptian chronology on which the traditional history is based. That chronology, throughout the relevant period, is in error by 121 years! Saite dynasty dates need to be lowered by that amount, moving the dynasty to a position overlapping the first Persian domination of Egypt.
In the traditional history the Saite dynasty kings ruled Egypt for 139 years, from 664-525 B.C. They were succeeded by the Persians, who ruled for 121 years, from 525-404 B.C., this on the assumption that Cambyses came to Egypt in 525 B.C. as a conqueror and destroyer, initiating Persian rule over Egypt. We argue instead that in 543 B.C. Cyrus the Great invaded and conquered an Egypt defended only by a small Babylonian army of occupation. He immediately established Psamtik I as a vassal king, the first of the Saite dynasty pharaohs to rule Egypt as a province of the Persian Empire. In that capacity the 26th dynasty kings governed Egypt for 139 years, from 543-404 B.C.

This important change to Egyptian Chronology is the linchpin on which the revision rests. It relies heavily on the works of those who have gone before documenting the numerous chronological issues which exist because of a clearly extended Egyptian history. Every other revision, from Immanuel Velikovsky to David Rohl, has butted up against the 26th dynasty dates which were thought to be solid and therefore left little room for all that needed to be placed in a small length of time. Once this bottleneck is relieved the anomalies described in previous works, such as Peter James' Centuries of Darkness, begin to be amazingly resolved. 

Egyptian History Revised

The four books in the Displaced Dynasties series are as follows:

Volume 1 - Nebuchadnezzar & The Egyptian Exile
Volume 2 - Piankhi the Chameleon
Volume 3 - The Genealogy of Ashakhet Part 1: From Amarna to Troy
Volume 4 - The Genealogy of Ashakhet Part 2: From Imhotep to Apophis
In the first book, The Chronicles of the Chaldean Kings are followed to show the sequence of events leading up to the Invasion of Egypt by Nebachadnezzer as told by Jeremiah and Ezekiel. The history of the 26th dynasty and particularly the reign of Pharaoh Amasis are shown to fit best in a context contemporary with the 27th, or Persian, dynasty. The Apis bulls of the Memphis Serapeum; The Udjahorresne Statue Inscription; The telescoping of the destruction wrought by Nebuchadnezzar into the history of Cambyses and the stories of Inaros, Amasis, Apries and Pharaoh Kbjd are all carefully placed within their proper historical context.
In the second book the Pharaoh Piankhi is given his proper due as a mighty king, many of whose accomplishments had been improperly given to his namesake 18th dynasty Pharaoh Thutmose III. He was contemporary with the end of the Assyrian empire and subsequent rise of the Babylonian empire. He waged many campaigns into the lands north of Egypt as chronicled on his inscriptions on the Temple of Amun in Thebes. The mis-identification of the Menkheperre Thutmose of the 18th dynasty with the Menkheperre Thutmose (Piankhi) of the 25th dynasty has placed the military exploits of Piankhi into the improper context of the 18th dynasty. This book sets that right.
In the third and fourth books, the Genealogy of Ashaket, propose a chronology extending back into the times of the third egyptian dynasty. Many synchronisms with Biblical material and other histories in the region are detailed and the true context of Troy and the Mycenaeans as well as the Santorini explosion are explained. Egyptian history is shortened to the point that the Biblical Joseph ben Jacob is seen to be one and the same with the great vizier Imhotep of the 3rd egyptian dynasty.
Many new identifications of Biblical contacts with Egypt are demonstrated.
Menkheperre Piankhi is Pharaoh Necho who battles with Babylon over the Kingdom of Judah 2 Kings 23 and Jer 38;
Takeloth III of the Southern 23rd dynasty is Pharaoh Tirhakah of Cush who contests Sennacherib in Isa 38 and 2 Kings 19;
Akhenaten is Pharaoh Shishak who defeats Rehoboam;
Jeroboam I is Labaya of the Amarna letters;
Solomon is clearly in a Bronze Age context not the iron age which shows no great kingdom of Israel;
Seankhkare Mentuhotep III of the 11th dynasty is the Pharaoh of the Exodus;
and many other small and Large events line up perfectly with the Biblical Chronology as presented in the Hebrew Texts.
In addition numerous papers have been written to discuss more supporting material for the revision as well as to examine the implications for Babylonian and Assyrian ancient history, primarily that the Kassites were absentee overlords and contemporary with the "dynasty E" kings of Babylon. Subsequent papers extended Babylonian history back through Hammurabi.
All in all the revision is extensive, covering nearly all of Ancient Near Eastern history and affecting understanding of the Egyptians, Babylonians, Persians, Assyrians, Hittites, Mittani, Ugarit, Greeks, Trojans and especially the Hebrews.